Card Table

CultureAmerican
Titles
  • Card Table
Datec. 1790–1820
Possible placeNew Hampshire, United States
Probable placeMassachusetts, United States
MediumMahogany; unidentified secondary woods
DimensionsOpen: 29 1/2 × 35 × 34 in. (74.9 × 88.9 × 86.4 cm)
Closed: 29 1/2 × 35 × 17 in. (74.9 × 88.9 × 43.2 cm)
Credit LineThe Bayou Bend Collection, museum purchase funded by The Brown Foundation, Inc.
Object numberB.2011.9
Current Location
Bayou Bend Collection and Gardens
Federal Parlor
On view

Explore Further

Department
Bayou Bend
Object Type
Description

In spite of efforts to legislate card playing in colonial Boston, the large number of surviving game tables demonstrates that playing whist, loo, faro, and quadrille was a widely accepted social activity. By the post-Revolutionary period card tables became increasingly prevalent and were often made in pairs, indicative of growing prosperity. Moreover, in keeping with the ideal of achieving balance within the neoclassical interior they functioned as matching side tables when not used for gaming. American examples in a vast array of shapes, and with a range of regional characteristics, are known in even greater numbers than were made in Britain at the time. Though tables with this shape—square with ovolo corners—were produced in almost every American urban center, this one has distinctive features that identify it as a Boston area example. These include construction techniques, its tripartite facade, and the prominent inlaid panel adapted from the Great Seal of the United States.

Related examples: The card table is one of at least ten Boston examples with this patriotic motif. Today, half of these are found in public collections: Yale University Art Gallery, Diplomatic Reception Rooms of the U. S. Department of State, and the Henry Ford history museum. Only one of the ten has come down with any documentation, and it is marked by a retailer, William Leverett, rather than a cabinetmaker. Variations within this group indicate that these tables are not from the hand of a single craftsman, but instead represent the collaboration of several workshops working with individuals such as John Dewhurst, a “banding and stringing maker,” listed in the Boston city directory for 1809. In fact, because these inlays were produced by specialists, they appear to have been adopted by craftsmen working even as far away as New York City.


ProvenanceCharles E. Stein, Jr., Baltimore; inherited by his daughter Sandra Stein Kouwenhoven (d. 2019), Baltimore; consigned to [Joe Kindig Antiques, York, Pennsylvania]; purchased by MFAH, 2011.
Inscriptions, Signatures and Marks
[no inscriptions]
[no marks]

Cataloguing data may change with further research.

If you have questions about this work of art or the MFAH Online Collection please contact us.

Card Table
c. 1800–1820
Mahogany; unidentified inlays and secondary woods
B.2004.44
Side Chair
c. 1780–1800
Mahogany; unidentified secondary woods and modern horsehair upholstery
B.2011.2
Pair of Side Chairs
c. 1858
Rosewood; unidentified secondary woods and modern show cover
B.2011.20.1,.2
Side Chair
c. 1670–1700
Cherry and unidentified secondary woods
B.97.6
Looking Glass
c. 1750–1820
Mahogany veneer, unidentified secondary woods, gold leaf, and mirrored glass
B.2012.205
Side Chair
Joseph Meeks & Sons
c. 1850–1865
Rosewood; unidentified secondary woods
B.2002.4.3
Armchair
Joseph Meeks & Sons
c. 1850–1865
Rosewood; unidentified secondary woods
B.2002.4.2
Sofa
Joseph Meeks & Sons
c. 1850–1865
Rosewood; unidentified secondary woods
B.2002.4.1
Desk
Herter Brothers
1869–1871
Maple, bird's-eye maple, rosewood, white oak, butternut, cherry, other woods, and brass; textile not original
77.373
Armchair
c. 1779
Beech; various secondary woods, gilding, and upholstery (not original)
96.1079
Commode
c. 1770
Walnut veneer; marquetry of tulipwood, elm, rosewood, and calamander; secondary woods: mahogany, red pine group, spruce, white oak group; and ormolu
96.1238
Commode
Vile & Cobb
c. 1762
Mahogany; various secondary woods, with ormolu
94.892